THE SECRET OF ISRAEL’S HIGH-TECH SUCCESS
Technion Campus, Israel (tyomitch)
LE MONDE/Worldcrunch

Technion Campus, Israel (tyomitch)

Technion Campus, Israel (tyomitch)
“The field of catalysts is very broad,” said Dr. Mark Gandelman from the chemistry faculty.
“They are at the heart of the food, pharmaceutical, automotive and aviation industry. The world market for catalysts is estimated at $500 billion a year.” These substances influence our daily life in many aspects. With the help of catalysts, we prepare innovative materials with special characteristics, and we can’t manage without them. In fact, much of what serves us is done by catalysts.
They are made mostly from a core of metals, surrounded by organic material that holds it together. Between the two, there is a chemical bond, and the type of bond is very important, because it gives the metal special characteristics,” Gendelman continued.
The new bond is based on positively charged nitrogen. Until now, bonds were based on carbon and related substances.
| Dr. Mark Gandelman |
[Reproduced from the Jerusalem Post]
“The field of catalysts is very broad,” said Dr. Mark Gandelman from the chemistry faculty.
“They are at the heart of the food, pharmaceutical, automotive and aviation industry. The world market for catalysts is estimated at $500 billion a year.” These substances influence our daily life in many aspects. With the help of catalysts, we prepare innovative materials with special characteristics, and we can’t manage without them. In fact, much of what serves us is done by catalysts.
They are made mostly from a core of metals, surrounded by organic material that holds it together. Between the two, there is a chemical bond, and the type of bond is very important, because it gives the metal special characteristics,” Gendelman continued.
The new bond is based on positively charged nitrogen. Until now, bonds were based on carbon and related substances.
| Dr. Mark Gandelman |
[Reproduced from the Jerusalem Post]


A video on economics has recently become an online blockbuster: a 2009 lecture by former Finance Ministry Accountant General Yaron Zelekha at the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology. It has been making the rounds on the social networks, and more than 58,000 people have viewed this one-hour-and-41-minute video on YouTube so far.
In the lecture, Zelekha says that “Israel is the poorest state in the West,” that its “economic policy is distorted and should be systematically overturned,” and that “Israel’s government has created an oligarchy.”
The number of people who have viewed this relatively long online video appears to reflect one of the main characteristics of the social protests: People want more than superficial slogans about economic policy. Articles in business sections about economic concentration and the cost of living, pasted up on posters at the tent camps, reinforce this trend.
“Had I known so many people would see the lecture, I would have made sure that all my lectures from that course were online,” he told Haaretz. “This is only the first, introductory lecture in the course, which is on the Israeli economy’s shift from labor to capital, and about ways of reversing this trend and making the economy just again, with fair and efficient resource distribution. Without a just distribution of resources, there’s no efficiency or growth.”
Many consider Zelekha to be Benjamin Netanyahu’s protege. The two men have known one another since the 1990s, when Zelekha was head of economic affairs in the Prime Minister’s Office. One Saturday in March 2003, Zelekha received a phone call from Netanyahu, a few hours after the latter had been appointed finance minister, in Ariel Sharon’s government.
“I gave you a six-year vacation, but the holiday is over. I want you to come work for me,” Netanyahu reportedly told Zelekha. Zelekha, then 33, had finished his doctorate and was not thrilled about returning to the public sector. Under heavy pressure from Netanyahu, though, he became accountant general in October 2003.
During his term, Zelekha received Netanyahu’s full support, even when he took on the country’s biggest businessmen, including the Ofer family and Eliezer Fishman. But then Netanyahu relinquished the portfolio and Ehud Olmert became finance minister. Zelekha had a new boss.
In 2006, Olmert became prime minister and Abraham Hirchson became finance minister. Neither supported Zelekha. In early 2007, Zelekha testified to the police’s national fraud division about Olmert’s efforts to help Australian shopping-mall magnate Frank Lowy win a tender for control of Bank Leumi. Olmert adjusted the tender’s terms to help the Lowy group, which would cost the state hundreds of millions of shekels, Zelekha alleged. The police launched an investigation, and Olmert and Hirchson maneuvered to fire the accountant general. (This would have been the first time in Israel’s history the accountant general was deposed in such circumstances .) In the end, Zelekha resigned.
Four years have gone by since he left the Finance Ministry. The Bank Leumi tender investigation was halted due to “insufficient evidence.” Meanwhile, the political map has changed: Netanyahu is prime minister, Hirchson is behind bars for offenses including taking bribes, and Olmert is embroiled in multiple other corruption affairs. Prosecutors have already decided to indict Olmert in what is turning out to be the country’s largest corruption scandal ever, the Holyland affair, pending a hearing.
Beyond corruption
Today, Zelekha is a 41-year-old professor. Unlike with many former accountant generals, the so-called tycoons made a point of offering Zelekha jobs when he left the public service. He established a consulting firm, but spends most of his time in academia. He is dean of the business management faculty at Ono Academic College, in Kiryat Ono, and a lecturer at other institutions.
“I don’t like to use the term ‘corruption,'” says Zelekha. “That minimizes the problem. Olmert and Hirchson’s cash envelopes – that’s corruption. Big businessmen can say, ‘Take care of corruption, what’s that got to do with us?’ but the economy’s main problem isn’t cash envelopes, but rather fundamentally unsound economic policy, which ought to be overhauled. This government, like its predecessors, ran an economic policy of an oligarchy. This is not anti-poverty policy, but rather pro-poverty policy. It manufactures poverty.”
Are you disappointed in Netanyahu?
“I have a lot of respect for Bibi, and the fact that I am very friendly with him on a personal level is no secret. But I have no response to your question. Aristotle once said that Plato was a good friend, but the truth was greater than them both.”
Do you think Israel is a poor country?
“Israel suffers from the highest levels of poverty in the West. Some 24.7 percent of the population lives under the poverty line. The middle class is closer to poverty here than in other places. Some 70 percent of households – the bottom seven deciles – have an average monthly income of less than NIS 15,000.”
What causes this?
“It comes from the unequal distribution of income, which makes the cake smaller for everyone. The inequality causes poverty. It’s a vicious cycle – unequal distribution makes the cake smaller, which aggravates poverty, which increases inequality, which stops the economy from growing. Who is responsible for this – the government or the oligarchy? Economic policy is the main factor creating poverty.
“The problem includes very high indirect taxes [like customs and VAT], which, coupled with low incomes, mean people have high expenses. This also makes the country uncompetitive – Israel ranks 79th in terms of economic competitiveness, which is nowhere near the West. And if that’s not enough, every few years we take a macro-economic blow due to a policy error, such as the decision to lower interest rates and create inflation two years ago.”
Why was that a mistake?
“Inflation expresses itself in one of three spheres, or in all of them: in goods and services, in the capital markets and in the real estate market. The prices of goods and services rose 4 percent, but inflation was not really felt there. Why not? Because of the high poverty level. How much can prices be raised? So most of the inflation was felt in real estate and in the capital markets, where prices went up 50 percent. That is a bubble, and bubbles collapse in the end.”
How is this connected to the oligarchy?
“The economic policy defends uncompetitiveness. It doesn’t carry out reforms. Why not? Because that’s how the oligarchy operates. That’s the connection between money and political power. Money means large employers and manufacturers that demand government protection, and this protection takes the form of stifling competition.
“The government’s job ought to be encouraging competition and pushing back monopolistic trends. The reforms would be simple to implement.
“I tried – unsuccessfully – to change how the government privatized things. I wanted to halt the use of tenders, which strengthen powerful groups and individuals. The tenders involve billions of shekels, and the privatization process means selling government companies’ stock to the public. I tried to promote [reform] in the case of Bank Leumi, but then-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon stifled the [legislative] effort in the face of pressure.”
Theories coming true
Since the Bank Leumi controversy, Zelekha’s detractors allege he promotes paranoid theories about oligarchies. Yet as time passes, his conspiracy theories seem less outlandish. The legal proceedings against Olmert reinforce what Zelekha has been saying, and the economic theory he propounded two years ago in that Technion lecture has impressed thousands of people protesting the high cost of living.
“There are three levels of improper management,” he explains in the lecture. “The highest one is when the state does not just take the fruit from the tree, but rather takes the entire farm. The state is rendering the public unable to influence economic policy.
“In professional literature, this is called appropriation. That is the primary damage to the economy. The reason for it is the connection between money and politics – and the media. No politician will talk about the issue, because if he opens his mouth, he won’t be elected. He won’t receive financing, and the media will attack him.
“How do I know this? I may not be a politician, but I addressed this subject. So what did Yedioth Ahronoth do to me? What did Globes do? Why is it that the newspapers with ties to money and politics attacked me? Why was Haaretz on my side, while the others were against me?”
Zelekha declares: “I’m not attacking the [newspaper owners], but rather the system.”
These remarks were made a year and a half before Nochi Dankner purchased control of Maariv and joined the list of big businessmen who control Israeli media outlets.
Zelekha continues: “I’m not a politician, and I don’t mind saying that I don’t believe I have a political future. It doesn’t matter who is elected; everyone does the same thing. Nobody will open up sectors to competition. Once again, they’re talking about privatizing [the Israel Lands Administration], and how do they want to do it? They don’t want to distribute assets among the public, but rather to give them to the controlling shareholders. Rather than distributing land to ordinary citizens, they’ve started to talk about tenders.”
Zelekha says: “You could carry out at least 40 reforms in any sector you want: cellphones, banks, media, gas stations. We know how to carry out the reforms, but governments are doing everything to block this.”
Brainwashed
“Once we agree that Israel is the poorest Western state in the world, you have to ask why, what’s so unusual here? Most of us have been brainwashed for decades by the political culture and media culture,” Zelekha continues in the lecture. “So we have several factors that seem unusual, but they’re ultimately not that meaningful.
“I am not an expert on security matters, but we are not poor because of defense spending. True, our situation isn’t the greatest. But if you look at the changes in GDP during Israel’s wars and at other times, you’ll see that during some wars, the economy grew, and in others it didn’t. In general, the level of defense spending has been declining for 50 years. So it’s not true that war is good for the economy, it’s bad for the economy, but its economic influence is relatively marginal, it’s not an explanation.
“What else do they tell us? That we are a young state. As it turns out, when Israel was established, the UN had 57 members, and now it has 200, and this means that three-quarters of the world’s countries are a bit younger than we are, including Cyprus and Singapore. So that’s apparently not the explanation.
“They tell us it’s the settlements, the ultra-Orthodox, the Arabs and women. Recently the Finance Minister [Yuval Steinitz] came to the Kiryat Ono college and said what we’ve heard from other ministers, that the main cause of poverty is the fact that the ultra-Orthodox and Arabs don’t work. There’s no bigger error. What the minister said is that there are 600,000 potential workers who are idle. Anti-social behavior. Therefore we produce less and therefore we’re poor.
“Now, let’s suppose that these 600,000 persons were sitting at the Kiryat Ono college, listening to Dr. Steinitz’s lecture, and they then said to themselves, ‘Wow, he’s right. We’re anti-social and not working, and the whole country is poor because of us. We can’t continue this way.’ And then the 600,000 knock on the minister’s door, and say, ‘Dr. Steinitz, we listened and we’re convinced, and now we’ve come to join the workforce. Where do we get involved?'”
Zelekha continues: “What, is anybody creating jobs here? Israel’s economy lacks 600,000 jobs – and that’s probably the most unusual aspect of our economy. With a workforce of 5.5 million, no Western economy created jobs for less than 60 percent. In Israeli terms, that means we should have 3.3 million jobs, but how many has the economy produced? Only 2.7 million. The economy produces fewer jobs than any other Western economy. Only 2.7 million people work here, because there are only 2.7 million jobs.
“If 600,000 Arabs, ultra-Orthodox and women were to join the workforce, meaning they were to start looking for work, unemployment wouldn’t be only single digit. It would jump to 30 percent.”
Almost two years have passed since Zelekha delivered that lecture. Now, as then, he still doesn’t see a future in politics. Asked whether he would want to enter politics and influence the Knesset from within, he replies dryly, “No, thank you.”
AMMAN: Within minutes of joining a mixed group of Jordanian and Maltese high school students learning about the importance of preserving cultural heritage for future generations, I realized that while historical narratives often serve to deepen conflicts, history in a general sense also has the ability to unite people.
The students were participants in the European Union’s Euromed Heritage 4 Program, ELIACH (Educational Linkage Approach in Cultural Heritage), a fairly new project that over the past year has been working with teenagers from several Mediterranean countries to instill a universal love of historic sites – regardless of where that site happens to be situated.
The Jordanian-Maltese meet took place last month in the Hashemite Kingdom, with students learning preservation and conservation techniques from some of the Mediterranean region’s most renowned conservationists, archaeologists, historical architects and other experts.
The program is the brainchild of Professor Dr. Anna Lobovikov-Katz, a senior lecturer and researcher at Technion – Israel Institute of Technology. I was sent to observe and write about the program’s objectives.
However, set against the backdrop of the ongoing Arab-Israeli conflict and aware of the growing power of Jordan’s anti-normalization movement, the organizers were concerned that even mentioning Israel’s involvement could have a negative impact on the program and detract from its overall goal of bringing people together to protect cultural heritage sites for future generations to enjoy.
Of course with Israelis taking the lead on this project, it did not take long for this information to reach the students. But much to everyone’s surprise, Israel’s presence did not seem to deter from the workshop’s ultimate success.
At the end of the four-day workshop, I was truly buoyed by the responses of this enthusiastic body of 15- and 16-year-olds, who quickly grasped the concept that a shared love of history can easily cut across borders to unite people, regardless of tensions on a political level.
“When the [Jordanian] participants first realized that Israelis were involved, they did not understand why they had to be here,” one of the Jordanian facilitators told me during the trip. “I explained to them that cultural heritage is not a political issue and that it is of equal importance to all people.”
“The goal is to create a sense of shared ownership among the students so that they will feel more responsible for taking care of the history and culture around them,” explained Christophe Graz, who has been assigned by the EU to monitor the project’s progress and implementation.
He admitted, however, that it had not been easy to bring all the countries together on this project because the issue of Israel’s participation for some nations was politically sensitive. Ultimately, however, all those involved realized that concerns over historical preservation must transcend borders and conflict.
“This program offers a unique opportunity to encourage international intercultural dialogue between course participants in the field of cultural heritage protection,” pointed out Lobovikov-Katz, whose partners include a distinguished team of experts from universities in Athens, Antwerp, Venice and Malta.
In conversations with the students, especially those from Jordan, I realized how quickly this concept can be turned into a reality if young people learn to appreciate history for history’s sake and are not fed it merely for the sake of strengthening their own nation’s narrative.
One of the Maltese students, 17-year-old Martina Bugelli, poignantly observed: “History does not belong to a certain country; it is a world heritage and I think that everyone should learn how past generations lived.”
Bugelli, who also visited Jordan’s most well-known heritage site, the 2,000-year-old Nabatean city of Petra, added: “It is a unique and irreplaceable landmark that belongs to all of us, to all humanity, and we must try to preserve and protect it for as long as we can.”
###
* Ruth Eglash is a senior reporter at The Jerusalem Post. Last year she became the first recipient of the United Nations X-Cultural Reporting award for a story she wrote with a Jordanian journalist. This article was written for the Common Ground News Service (CGNews).
Source: Common Ground News Service (CGNews), 16 August 2011, www.commongroundnews.org
AMMAN: Within minutes of joining a mixed group of Jordanian and Maltese high school students learning about the importance of preserving cultural heritage for future generations, I realized that while historical narratives often serve to deepen conflicts, history in a general sense also has the ability to unite people.
The students were participants in the European Union’s Euromed Heritage 4 Program, ELIACH (Educational Linkage Approach in Cultural Heritage), a fairly new project that over the past year has been working with teenagers from several Mediterranean countries to instill a universal love of historic sites – regardless of where that site happens to be situated.
The Jordanian-Maltese meet took place last month in the Hashemite Kingdom, with students learning preservation and conservation techniques from some of the Mediterranean region’s most renowned conservationists, archaeologists, historical architects and other experts.
The program is the brainchild of Professor Dr. Anna Lobovikov-Katz, a senior lecturer and researcher at Technion – Israel Institute of Technology. I was sent to observe and write about the program’s objectives.
However, set against the backdrop of the ongoing Arab-Israeli conflict and aware of the growing power of Jordan’s anti-normalization movement, the organizers were concerned that even mentioning Israel’s involvement could have a negative impact on the program and detract from its overall goal of bringing people together to protect cultural heritage sites for future generations to enjoy.
Of course with Israelis taking the lead on this project, it did not take long for this information to reach the students. But much to everyone’s surprise, Israel’s presence did not seem to deter from the workshop’s ultimate success.
At the end of the four-day workshop, I was truly buoyed by the responses of this enthusiastic body of 15- and 16-year-olds, who quickly grasped the concept that a shared love of history can easily cut across borders to unite people, regardless of tensions on a political level.
“When the [Jordanian] participants first realized that Israelis were involved, they did not understand why they had to be here,” one of the Jordanian facilitators told me during the trip. “I explained to them that cultural heritage is not a political issue and that it is of equal importance to all people.”
“The goal is to create a sense of shared ownership among the students so that they will feel more responsible for taking care of the history and culture around them,” explained Christophe Graz, who has been assigned by the EU to monitor the project’s progress and implementation.
He admitted, however, that it had not been easy to bring all the countries together on this project because the issue of Israel’s participation for some nations was politically sensitive. Ultimately, however, all those involved realized that concerns over historical preservation must transcend borders and conflict.
“This program offers a unique opportunity to encourage international intercultural dialogue between course participants in the field of cultural heritage protection,” pointed out Lobovikov-Katz, whose partners include a distinguished team of experts from universities in Athens, Antwerp, Venice and Malta.
In conversations with the students, especially those from Jordan, I realized how quickly this concept can be turned into a reality if young people learn to appreciate history for history’s sake and are not fed it merely for the sake of strengthening their own nation’s narrative.
One of the Maltese students, 17-year-old Martina Bugelli, poignantly observed: “History does not belong to a certain country; it is a world heritage and I think that everyone should learn how past generations lived.”
Bugelli, who also visited Jordan’s most well-known heritage site, the 2,000-year-old Nabatean city of Petra, added: “It is a unique and irreplaceable landmark that belongs to all of us, to all humanity, and we must try to preserve and protect it for as long as we can.”
###
* Ruth Eglash is a senior reporter at The Jerusalem Post. Last year she became the first recipient of the United Nations X-Cultural Reporting award for a story she wrote with a Jordanian journalist. This article was written for the Common Ground News Service (CGNews).
Source: Common Ground News Service (CGNews), 16 August 2011, www.commongroundnews.org
| Photo by: Reuters/Catherine Benson |